這...這...這太誇張了吧?
氚管的錢遠遠超過電筒了!
是把電筒當氚管收納盒是吧?
superhsiao 發表於 2012-5-16 00:39

真誇張
什麼時後會出縣整隻粘滿氚管的
danicel 發表於 2012-5-16 01:36

在這把鈦燈上的氚管價格並沒有超過鈦燈喔 !
洪煮刃 發表於 2012-5-16 00:48

由此可証這把鈦燈價值不斐啊！
不過這氚管+鈦燈實在壯觀，
真正的台灣之光啊！
CPF那些老外沒一個比得上的！
rockhong01 發表於 2012-5-16 08:53

真好看
可是為什麼不固定起來
JRL 發表於 2012-5-16 12:04

五顏六色的，好美啊！
可是自然界中鮮豔色澤的動物和昆蟲多半有毒；
想請教一下，這會自己發光的東西，有沒有輻射啊？
sonmo 發表於 2012-5-16 13:22

Health concerns

For more details on this topic, see Tritium.

While these devices contain a radioactive substance, it is currently believed that self-powered lighting does not pose a significant health concern. A 2007 report by the UK government's Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Ionizing Radiation declared the health risks of tritium exposure to be double that previously set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection,[1] but encapsulated tritium lighting devices, typically taking the form of a luminous glass tube embedded in a thick block of clear plastic, prevent the user from being exposed to the tritium at all unless the device is broken apart.

Tritium presents no external radiation threat when encapsulated in non-hydrogen-permeable containers due to its low penetration depth, which is insufficient to penetrate intact human skin. The primary danger from tritium arises if it is inhaled, ingested, injected or otherwise absorbed into the body. This results in the emitted radiation being absorbed in a relatively small region of the body, again due to the low penetration depth. The biological half-life of tritium—the time it takes for half of an ingested dose to be expelled from the body—is low, at only 12 days. Tritium excretion can be accelerated further by increasing water intake to 3-4 liters/day.[2]

Direct, short-term exposure to small amounts of tritium is relatively harmless. If a tritium tube should break, one should leave the area and allow the gas to diffuse into the air. Tritium exists naturally in the environment, but in very small quantities.

煮刃, 下次會有更.......長...的.
desther 發表於 2013-4-21 09:55